Proceedings

Find matching any: Reset
Wilson, J.A
Cesario Pereira Pinto, J
Uhrmann, F
Add filter to result:
Authors
Ferreyra, R
Applegate, D.B
Berger, A.W
Berne, D.T
Craker, B.E
Daggett, D.G
Gowler, A
Bullock, R.J
Haringx, S.C
Hillyer, C
Howatt, T
Nef, B.K
Rhea, S.T
Russo, J.M
Nieman, S.T
Sanders, P
Wilson, J.A
Wilson, J.W
Tevis, J.W
Stelford, M.W
Shearouse, T.W
Schultz, E.D
Reddy, L
Scholz, O
Uhrmann, F
Gerth, S
Pieger, K
Claußen, J
Danford, D.D
Nelson, K.J
Rhea, S.T
Stelford, M.W
Ferreyra, R
Wilson, J.A
Craker, B.E
Cesario Pereira Pinto, J
Thompson, L
Mueller, N
Mieno, T
Balboa, G
Puntel, L
Scholz, O
Uhrmann, F
Weule, M
Meyer, T
Gilson, A
Makarov, J
Hansen, J
Henties, T
Ferreyra, R
Lehmann, J
Wilson, J.A
Topics
Standards & Data Stewardship
Proximal and Remote Sensing of Soil and Crop (including Phenotyping)
Big Data, Data Mining and Deep Learning
In-Season Nitrogen Management
Robotics and Automation with Row and Horticultural Crops
Data Analytics for Production Ag
Type
Oral
Poster
Year
2016
2018
2022
2024
Home » Authors » Results

Authors

Filter results6 paper(s) found.

1. Toward Geopolitical-Context-Enabled Interoperability in Precision Agriculture: AgGateway's SPADE, PAIL, WAVE, CART and ADAPT

AgGateway is a nonprofit consortium of 240+ businesses working to promote, enable and expand eAgriculture. It provides a non-competitive collaborative environment, transparent funding and governance models, and anti-trust and intellectual property policies that guide and protect members’ contributions and implementations. AgGateway primarily focuses on implementing existing standards and collaborating with other organizations to extend them when necessary. In 2010 AgGateway identified... R. Ferreyra, D.B. Applegate, A.W. Berger, D.T. Berne, B.E. Craker, D.G. Daggett, A. Gowler, R.J. Bullock, S.C. Haringx, C. Hillyer, T. Howatt, B.K. Nef, S.T. Rhea, J.M. Russo, S.T. Nieman, P. Sanders, J.A. Wilson, J.W. Wilson, J.W. Tevis, M.W. Stelford, T.W. Shearouse, E.D. Schultz, L. Reddy

2. A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Data Acquisition Methods for Phenotyping Applications

Currently Phenotyping is primarily performed using two-dimensional imaging techniques. While this yields interesting data about a plant, a lot of information is lost using regular cameras. Since a plant is three-dimensional, the use of dedicated 3D-imaging sensors provides a much more complete insight into the phenotype of the plant. Different methods for 3D-data acquisition are available, each with their inherent advantages and disadvantages. These have to be addressed depending on the particular... O. Scholz, F. Uhrmann, S. Gerth, K. Pieger, J. Claußen

3. ADAPT: A Rosetta Stone for Agricultural Data

Modern farming requires increasing amounts of data exchange among hardware and software systems. Precision agriculture technologies were meant to enable growers to have information at their fingertips to keep accurate farm records (and calculate production costs), improve decision-making and promote effi­cien­cies in crop management, enable greater traceability, and so forth. The attainment of these goals has been limited by the plethora of proprietary, incompatible data formats among... D.D. Danford, K.J. Nelson, S.T. Rhea, M.W. Stelford, R. Ferreyra, J.A. Wilson, B.E. Craker

4. Evaluation of Nitrogen Recommendation Tools for Winter Wheat in Nebraska

Attaining both high yield and high nitrogen (N) use efficiency (NUE) simultaneously remains a current research challenge in crop production. Digital ag technologies for site-specific N management have been demonstrated to improve NUE. This is due to the ability of digital technologies to account for the spatial and temporal distribution of crop N demand and available soil N in the field which varies greatly according to... J. Cesario pereira pinto, L. Thompson, N. Mueller, T. Mieno, G. Balboa, L. Puntel

5. Creating a Comprehensive Software Framework for Sensor-driven Precision Agriculture

Robots and GPS-guided tractors are the backbone of smart farming and precision agriculture. Many companies and vendors contribute to the market, each offering their own customized solutions for common tasks. These developments are often based on vendor-specific, proprietary components, protocols and software. Many small companies that produce sensors, actuators or software for niche applications could contribute their expertise to the global efforts of creating smart farming solutions, if their... O. Scholz, F. Uhrmann, M. Weule, T. Meyer, A. Gilson, J. Makarov, J. Hansen, T. Henties

6. Standards for Data-driven Agrifood Systems, One Year After the ISO Strategic Advisory Group for Smart Farming

The lack of data interoperability is a major obstacle for the data-driven, principled multi-objective decision-making required for modern agrifood systems to help meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Aware of this, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) chartered a Strategic Advisory Group for Smart Farming (SAG-SF) to survey the existing standardization landscape of the domain within ISO, to identify gaps where additional standardization is needed, and to provide a strategic... R. Ferreyra, J. Lehmann, J.A. Wilson