ISPA Account

2018 ICPA Photos

Suggestions For 2020 Conference Location
Have an idea for the location of the 2020 conference? Let us know by filling out this form.
Select the city to host the 15th ICPA Conference.
St. Louis, Missouri, USA (In conjunction with InfoAg 2020)
Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
If OTHER selected, please enter the name of the city.
Enter the name and email of the contact for this city.
Enter your reason for suggesting this city for the 2020 conference.
Thank you for your time and interest. Your responses have been transmitted succesfully.


Access to the proceedings of the 14th ICPA is available online:
All the oral and poster presentation abstracts are available to the public. Access to the full papers and extended abstracts is limited to ISPA members and registered attendees of the 14th ICPA. Full papers and extended abstracts are also available for a fee to the public.
ISPA members need to login to the website using the panel on the left side of the home page. Use your email address associated with your membership.
If you attended the 14th ICPA Conference and do not know your password, or have not yet set up an account, you can click here.

Proceeding Spotlight

14th International Conference on Precision Agriculture Presentation

Optimum Spatial Resolution for Precision Weed Management

The occurrence and number of herbicide-resistant weeds in the world has increased in recent years. Controlling these weeds becomes more difficult and raises production costs. Precision spraying technologies have been developed to overcome this challenge. However, these systems still have relatively high acquisition cost, requiring studies of the relation between the spatial distribution of weeds and the economically optimum spatial resolution of the control method. In this context, the objective of this work was to evaluate the best control resolution in simulated scenarios of weed distribution to create guidelines to relate the spatial variability of weed distribution with the optimum resolution of weed control. The methodology uses geostatistical simulations to construct different scenarios of weed distribution, based on real observations from Brazilian crop production fields. The simulations were made in a 0.1 X 0.1 m spatial resolution, considering only presence or absence of weeds to be sprayed in each pixel. We evaluated control resolution starting from 0.2 X 0.2 m to 36 X 3 m, considering section widths and valves on/off timing. In each scenario we calculated the minimum area to be sprayed using each technology, targeting a minimum of 99% of weed control. The economical evaluation was based on the total application cost, considering the herbicide savings and the increase in application cost of each technology. Low incidence levels and random distribution of weeds is favorable for sub meter control resolutions. For section control based applications the range is the more important parameter for predicting herbicide savings, and for nozzle control the nugget effect is more important. The raise in herbicide control costs are likely to be a key driver in the adoption of precision spraying technologies.